The Group of Eight

Response:

The JSA Discussion Paper envisages additional representation on the tripartite advisory body from experts in skills and training or tertiary education. It is important that the proposed tripartite advisory body specifically include experts in the university sector given over half of employment growth will be in occupations that will require university education. 
The Discussion Paper proposes to establish various sub-committees under the advisory body. Given the functions of JSA involve analysing and advising on the labour market and skills, one of these sub committees should include experts in workforce planning, education and training, labour economics, as well as data analytics. This can augment the existing skills within the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations and will assist the advisory body to have available independent technical advice to call on.

Response:

A focus on the evidence base should be a key principle to guide JSA’s priorities. The tripartite JSA advisory body will include governments, unions, and industry. These representatives may at times have potentially different positions with respect to the workplan and priorities of JSA, and their strategic deliberations will influence the direction of JSA. Hence, using an evidence base to prioritise work and publishing the minutes of the tripartite advisory body’s strategic deliberations can enhance the priorities and direction of JSA. 
A key principle related to the proposed JSA workplan should be a focus on quality – that is, quality of advice to government, quality of research and analysis, and quality of engagement with stakeholders. JSA can build on the work of its predecessor, the National Skills Commission, by reviewing existing analytical and information products and identifying the need for and designing new products. Ultimately JSA’s advice should enhance the quality of policy decisions related to jobs and skills, leading to improvements in the functioning of labour markets across Australia.

Response:

The proposal for an annual JSA workplan that clearly specifies the priorities for the 12-month period and is informed by consultation is welcome. Broader input into the development and refinement of its workplan could come from the Commissioner and/or the Deputy Commissioners directly engaging with international agencies and institutions that have implemented similar topical workplans, to garner lessons for Australia. 

Response:

The ability for key stakeholders to comment on terms of reference of JSA major studies is valuable. For example, the Go8 has recently made a submission on the terms of reference for the JSA study on the clean energy workforce to recommend that any definition of the workforce include the research workforce given their expertise and role in creating new technologies. This highlights the importance of JSA consulting with stakeholders and involving them in their work. Universities can provide a level of nuance and perspective that can strengthen JSA’s advice to government.
More broadly, as mentioned earlier, having a sub-committee of technical experts to the tripartite advisory body will assist, as will potentially JSA holding regular conferences of interested stakeholders (see response to question 7 below). Moreover, the JSA Commissioner could host public webinars at the commencement and conclusion of major studies to explain the rationale and objective of the given major study, and in turn the key findings and implications of the major study. 

Response:

The JSA website has various labour market information and products such as the Internet Vacancy Index and the Monthly Labour Market Dashboard. Yet the full scope of JSA’s existing data and information collection and inventory is not clear – as a start JSA should undertake and publish an inventory of existing information and data. 
The tripartite nature of JSA also provides an opportunity for JSA to engage with participating stakeholders to directly source more granular and timely data and information. For example, the JSA could potentially access detailed information from education and training providers in each jurisdiction regarding student enrolments and graduation to monitor the ‘pipeline’ of skilled labour supply. Similarly, JSA could seek information from industry regarding emerging labour demand, well ahead of official published data on job advertisements and vacancies. 
Coordination across existing government portfolios, agencies and data is also vital for the JSA. There is labour market and education and training related data in various federal government departments and agencies, such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics, that JSA should explore accessing to build a stronger evidence base. One example is data from the Department of Home Affairs regarding the status of visa applications and processing – which can provide some insight into existing and future labour supply. 

Response:

Beyond the consultation opportunities canvassed in the Discussion Paper, such as engagement groups, JSA could also schedule regular stakeholder meetings as a means of engagement, much as the Treasury and the Reserve Bank of Australia have structured (industry) liaison programs. This will assist with broader input into the development and refinement of the JSA workplan. The engagement should also include academic experts in Australian universities that conduct research into Australia’s labour market and education and training systems. 

Response:

JSA should consider holding regular conferences of interested stakeholders and labour market experts to present their labour market research and analysis. This would allow for broader dissemination of the products and advice of the JSA and enable engagement with a broader set of stakeholders and interested parties. 

Response:

The JSA’s current website provides some useful information but could be improved by better organising and presenting its data and analysis. The website could be redesigned to have an easier to navigate section on published reports, and associated data by topic and date. A potential model for redesigning sections of the JSA website is the Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (AIHW) website (https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data) that has, by topic area, a well organised set of reports, data, data sources, glossary, and links to other relevant information. 

Response:

To account for geographic and industry differences, where applicable the JSA should disaggregate and publish data and analysis by region, occupation, industry, assisting stakeholders who often need granular data on which to make informed decisions.